Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanson, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-27T19:34:59Z
dc.date.available2015-05-27T19:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/118
dc.descriptionA THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF DIVINITYen_US
dc.description.abstractThe current location of Ai at et-Tell has caused a number of problems for those who take the Bible seriously. The main problem is that there was no occupation of et-Tell during the time of conquest. Because of this many have stated that the conquest didn’t happen or that it happened as a peaceful infiltration. Others have taken another look at the current location and then suggested other sites where the biblical requirements match that of archaeology. The purpose of this paper is to take a close look at the evidence supporting and contrasting et-Tell with the biblical city of Ai. I will approach this from the viewpoint that God’s Word is the inspired word of God. It is historically true and accurate. Using God’s Word as my source and authority in matters that actually happened I will examine the evidence being unearthed, extra-biblical sources, topographical maps, and local tradition.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAien_US
dc.subjectArchaeologyen_US
dc.subjectBiblical Archaeologyen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Current Identification of Ai and Other Possible Sitesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record