Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchuetze, John D.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-18T20:10:58Z
dc.date.available2015-07-18T20:10:58Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3091
dc.descriptionOriginally published in Vol. 105:2 (Spring 2008) of the Wisconsin Lutheran Quarterly.en_US
dc.description.abstractProf. Schuetze briefly discusses the on-going argument over whether the Cup in the Lord’s Supper must contain fermented grape wine. He presents the viewpoint, based on biblical and extra-biblical sources, that we cannot assert that “fruit of the vine” always refers to wine. He asserts that we would not be wise to upset historical and biblical precedent by using something other than wine, or allowing a believer or body of believers to choose arbitrarily. But he adds that the Spirit’s choice of the uncertain term “fruit of the vine” allows us to make exceptions in the case of those with physical restrictions against drinking alcohol.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLord's Supperen_US
dc.titleFruit of the Vineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record