Crossing the Line: Where Baptism Divides Us

Abstract

Baptism is the line in the sand that separates the various Christian denominations. Christians use this one word as a litmus test to determine the doctrinal differences among denominations. It reveals the framework of the mind through which people view God’s place within baptism. A “sacrificial” (obedience) viewpoint supposes baptism is an outward profession of faith. A “partial” look dictates that baptism is a covenant renewed, showing its efficacy from both God and man, working through the family and church in which the Christian resides. Apart from any human work, baptism works through the Word to redeem, regenerate, and save a dead sinner who can do nothing, as explained in the “sacramental” viewpoint. Each denomination adheres to a different purview. To further understand the Lutheran’s position and other denominations, conversations with priests and pastors regarding baptism reveal what each believes. For the Roman Catholic, concupiscence remains after baptism; therefore, the Holy Spirit infused grace within baptism, but the individual Christian still relies upon his family and church to work out his own salvation. The southern ELCA churches, on the other hand, believe in the sacramental nature of baptism; however, the slippery slope into progressive theology will diminish the value of this sacrament in the ELCA. Reformed Presbyterians baptize too with water and in the name of the triune God. However, they claim this is merely a sign of being connected to Christ; only later can Christ take away their sins and regenerate the human heart. With their theology of double predestination, they can only trust in God’s goodness to be part of the elect. Likewise, the Baptist view baptism as without spiritual gifts from God. Once the Holy Spirit has regenerated the Baptist, he professes his belief through choosing baptism as a fruit of faith.