dc.contributor.author | Brug, John F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-09T15:07:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09T15:07:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1985 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brug, John F. A Literary and Archaeological Study of the Philistines. BAR International Series 265. Oxford: B.A.R., 1985. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780860543374 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://essays.wisluthsem.org:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7353 | |
dc.description | The dissertation, titled “A Literary and Archaeological Study of the Philistines,” analyzes the population and culture of Philistia during the Early Iron Age, drawing from both literary and archaeological sources. It challenges the notion of a massive migration of the Sea Peoples, including the Philistines, into Palestine, instead suggesting a gradual integration of foreign and indigenous elements. Archaeological evidence indicates that Philistine culture was a hybrid with a predominant Canaanite influence, as seen in the continued use of Canaanite pottery forms and a minority presence of distinctive Philistine Ware.
The study meticulously details the percentage of Philistine Ware at various archaeological sites, often finding it to not exceed 25% of the ceramic assemblage, suggesting strong cultural continuity from the Late Bronze Age. Examination of burial practices, metalwork, architecture, and art all reflect a significant Canaanite or Levantine element, with minimal influence from Mycenaean traditions.
Language analysis reveals that despite the lack of concrete evidence on the Philistine language, the predominance of Semitic dialects and names in the region suggests strong continuity with existing cultures rather than the introduction of a new language group. The dissertation argues against a sudden cultural shift or large-scale migration from the Aegean at the time of Ramses III, instead positing that the Philistine culture and population had roots stretching back to the Bronze Age, evidenced by the enduring Canaanite components of their culture.
The dissertation concludes that the amalgamation of native and foreign peoples likely resulted in the group historically known as “Philistines,” rather than a distinct foreign tribe displacing the existing population. This conclusion is supported by a thorough review of material culture, literary accounts, and an exhaustive bibliographic compilation relevant to Philistine studies. The author suggests that any Aegean influence was limited and short-lived, and the Philistine culture was, in essence, a continuation of the Late Bronze Age civilization with additional, albeit minor, foreign elements. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study is an analysis of the population and culture of Philistia in the Early Iron Age on the basis of the literary and archaeological evidence. Both the Egyptian records and the Old Testament texts imply that the arrival of the Philistines and other Sea Peoples in Palestine was not a sudden massive migration but a gradual amalgamation of foreign and indigenous elements. The archaeological evidence indicates that the Philistine culture was a hybrid culture in which the ‘Canaanite’ element remained predominant. An important part of this study is a determination of the percentage of Philistine Ware at the sites at which it occurs. Philistine Ware rarely exceeds 25% of the total ceramic assemblage from a site. It often is in the 5%-15% range. There is a strong continuity of ceramic types from the Late Bronze Age at sites which have Philistine Ware. In the overall ceramic assemblage of sites which have Philistine Ware, the Canaanite influence on the pottery is at least as strong as the Mycenaean influence. A study of Philistine burial practices, metalwork, architecture, ships, minor arts, religion, and language reveals a very strong ‘Canaanite,’ ‘Semitic,’ or Levantine element in all aspects of the Philistine culture. All of the evidence suggests that there was a strong carry-over from the Late Bronze Age in the population of Iron Age Philistia and that the influx of Sea Peoples into Palestine at the time of Ramses III was probably a settlement of small groups similar to the movement of the Northmen into various countries of Europe rather than a massive folk-migration. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | B.A.R. | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistia | en_US |
dc.subject | Early Iron Age | en_US |
dc.subject | Sea Peoples | en_US |
dc.subject | Cultural amalgamation | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine Ware | en_US |
dc.subject | Archaeological analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Mycenaean influence | en_US |
dc.subject | Canaanite culture | en_US |
dc.subject | Bronze Age continuity | en_US |
dc.subject | Burial practices | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine metalwork | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine ships | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine arts | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine religion | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistine language | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistines | en_US |
dc.subject | Philistines -- History | en_US |
dc.subject | Iron age -- Palestine | en_US |
dc.subject | Pottery, Ancient -- Palestine | en_US |
dc.subject | Excavations (Archaeology) -- Palestine | en_US |
dc.subject | Palestine -- Antiquities | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle East -- Civilization -- To 622 | en_US |
dc.subject | Cultural assimilation -- Middle East -- History | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle East -- Ethnic relations | en_US |
dc.title | A Literary and Archaeological Study of the Philistines | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |